June 5, 2008
Judging Modernism
Modern and post-modern ways of thinking to me have always been pictured as different ways to view the world, with pros and cons of each.
In a book on adult education (Learning to Listen, Learning to Teach), Jane Vella holds up quantum concepts as a breakthrough for understanding teaching and relating. Quantum physics is relatively new science in the 20th century. Applying this to the social sciences results in theories on quantum thinking. Quantum is a measure of energy. Related to quantum ‘thinking’ is synergy, separate units are seen as part of a whole, and context becomes important.
Let’s follow some logic. Modern thinking was based on a Newtonian world with mechanics of cause and effect, and defined structures.
Now that we define the world with quantum physics, ie, the Newtonian way was incorrect, does that mean that much of modern thinking was based on a false view of how the world was to work? Can we now make value judgments against much of the modernistic worldview?
It would therefore not just a different way of looking at the world, but an incorrect way.
If so, this has further implications for the way much of our current Western society is set up.